1) The first point of a small collective group/sole filmmaker with a "minuscule budget" could not be more akin with UNCW. We have worked in groups from the very first 201 Production class! And budget? I believe I had once spent $2.00 on a box of gushers to create another sensory dimension to a film, but otherwise it was whatever my group members and I could find around our homes.
2) This confuses me to some point--how do we decide who does what in each group, if we are supposed to kind of be doing them all? Are we all each other's assistants?
3) This just makes sense, because if it was easy to follow, what would be experimental with it? Unless we're talking about the first ever person to use back/forward flash... that would have been experimental for the time, right? Or do I sound like a young punk?
4) This is the part that gets me the most "amped" for class. In 6x1, painting/scratching on the celluloid felt like arts and crafts, and seeing the projection of it was really interesting. It was rewarding, but also enlightening to try to figure out areas of improvement. It also gave me hands-on actualization of the time it takes to draw animations.
5) If I'm interpreting this correctly, it makes sense as well. Recycling used scenes? Like crowd sourcing from youtube to create something with a new context?
6) I would like to think that it's simply open to interpretation, like a classic book. This particular point made me think about how I tend to skip over author notes/Q&As. If the author wanted something in specific to be known, they should have put it in the published work. It's not fair to criticize a reader's interpretations on a book (or film) if an opposing concept was NOT included. There are no re-dos! Except sometimes there are (Star Wars? Star Trek? The Great Gatsby? How many times are these movies re-done? Star Wars never seems to end...).
-lizzie
No comments:
Post a Comment